Integrated Taxonomic Information System - Report
Go to Print Version

Pycnogonum grossipes  Fabricius, 1780
Taxonomic Serial No.: 1139251

(Download Help) Pycnogonum grossipes TSN 1139251

 Taxonomy and Nomenclature
       
  Kingdom: Animalia  
  Taxonomic Rank: Species  
  Common Name(s):    
  Valid Name: Nymphon grossipes (Fabricius, 1780)
 
       
  Taxonomic Status:    
  Current Standing: invalid - other, see comments   
       
  Data Quality Indicators:    
  Record Credibility Rating: verified - standards met  
       

 References
       
  Expert(s):    
  Expert:    
  Notes:    
  Reference for:    
       
  Other Source(s):    
  Source:    
  Acquired:    
  Notes:    
  Reference for:    
       
  Publication(s):    
  Author(s)/Editor(s): Fabricius, Otto  
  Publication Date: 1780   
  Article/Chapter Title:    
  Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.: Fauna Groenlandica, systematice sistens animalia Groenlandiae occidentalis hactenus indagata, quoad nomen specificum, triviale, vernaculumque   
  Page(s): xiv + 452   
  Publisher: Ioannis Gottlob Rothe   
  Publication Place: Hafniae (Copenhagen), Denmark   
  ISBN/ISSN:    
  Notes: Available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/40539354   
  Reference for: original description   
       
  Author(s)/Editor(s): Krøyer, Henrik  
  Publication Date: 1844   
  Article/Chapter Title: Bidrag til Kundskab om Pyknogoniderne eller Søspindlerne   
  Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.: Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, ser. 2, vol. 1   
  Page(s): 90-139   
  Publisher:    
  Publication Place:    
  ISBN/ISSN:    
  Notes: Available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2359697   
  Reference for: Pycnogonum grossipes   
       

 Geographic Information
       
  Geographic Division:    
       
  Jurisdiction/Origin:    
 

 

    

 Comments
       
  Comment: Fabricius (1780:229) gives the name Pycnogonum grossipes, but does list in synonymy Phalangium grosspies, citing what is clearly Linnaeus (1767:1027, see https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/462493 ). It is unclear to ITIS whether Fabricius' name should be considered a new combination of Linnaeus', or if there is some issue with the availability of that earlier name, or perhaps that it is unidentifiable or otherwise dubious. There are apparently questions about some of Linnaeus' claims, but that may be nomenclaturally irrelevant unless the identity of the earlier name is in doubt  
 

 

    

 
 Subordinate Taxa  Rank  Verified Standards Met  Verified Min Standards Met  Unverified Percent Standards Met
 
LOADING...
 

A gray graphic bar
Search on:  Any Name or TSN  Common Name  Scientific Name  TSN
     


Disclaimer: ITIS taxonomy is based on the latest scientific consensus available, and is provided as a general reference source for interested parties. However, it is not a legal authority for statutory or regulatory purposes. While every effort has been made to provide the most reliable and up-to-date information available, ultimate legal requirements with respect to species are contained in provisions of treaties to which the United States is a party, wildlife statutes, regulations, and any applicable notices that have been published in the Federal Register. For further information on U.S. legal requirements with respect to protected taxa, please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

A gray bar