Integrated Taxonomic Information System - Report

Go to Print Version

Chaetangium ornatum  (L.) Kütz.
Taxonomic Serial No.: 183044

(Download Help) Chaetangium ornatum TSN 183044

 Taxonomy and Nomenclature
       
  Kingdom: Plantae  
  Taxonomic Rank: Species  
  Common Name(s):    
  Accepted Name(s): Gelidium vittatum (L.) Kütz.
 
       
  Taxonomic Status:    
  Current Standing: not accepted - other, see comments   
       
  Data Quality Indicators:    
  Record Credibility Rating: verified - standards met  
       

 References
       
  Expert(s):    
  Expert:    
  Notes:    
  Reference for:    
       
  Other Source(s):    
  Source: NODC Taxonomic Code, database (version 8.0)  
  Acquired: 1996   
  Notes:    
  Reference for: Chaetangium ornatum   
       
  Publication(s):    
  Author(s)/Editor(s): Parkinson, P. G.  
  Publication Date: 1983   
  Article/Chapter Title: The typification and status of the name Chaetangium (algae)   
  Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.: Taxon, vol. 32, no. 4   
  Page(s):    
  Publisher:    
  Publication Place:    
  ISBN/ISSN: 0040-0262   
  Notes:    
  Reference for: Chaetangium ornatum   
       
  Author(s)/Editor(s): Silva, Paul C., Philip W. Basson, and Richard L. Moe  
  Publication Date: 1996   
  Article/Chapter Title: Catalogue of the Benthic Marine Algae of the Indian Ocean   
  Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.: University of California Publications in Botany, vol. 79   
  Page(s): xiv + 1259   
  Publisher: University of California Press   
  Publication Place: Berkeley, California, USA   
  ISBN/ISSN: 0-520-09810-2   
  Notes: Electronic version available at http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/rlmoe/tioc/ioctoc.html as of 21/12/04   
  Reference for: Chaetangium ornatum   
       
  Author(s)/Editor(s): Tronchin, E. M., D. W. Freshwater, J. J. Bolton, and R. J. Anderson  
  Publication Date: 2002   
  Article/Chapter Title: A Reassessment and Reclassification of Species in the Genera Onikusa Akatsuka and Suhria J. Agardh ex Endlicher (Gelidiales, Rhodophyta) Based on Molecular and Morphological Data   
  Journal/Book Name, Vol. No.: Botanica Marina, vol. 45, no. 6   
  Page(s): 548-558   
  Publisher:    
  Publication Place:    
  ISBN/ISSN: 0006-8055   
  Notes:    
  Reference for: Chaetangium ornatum   
       

 Geographic Information
       
  Geographic Division:    
       
  Jurisdiction/Origin:    
 

 

   

 Comments
       
  Comment: Silva, Basson and Moe (1996) state "the Sydney Code clarified the typification of generic names in such a way that Chaetangium Kützing (1843b: 392) was required to be typified with Fucus ornatus Linnaeus (1771: 312; type locality: Cape of Good Hope, South Africa), the only species cited in the protologue, rather than with material in hand. Papenfuss (1952: 173) examined the type of F. ornatus in Linnaeus's herbarium (LINN) and found that it was conspecific with F. vittatus Linnaeus (1767b: 718), the type species of Suhria J. Agardh ex Endlicher (1843: 41) in the Gelidiaceae. To accommodate the material in Kützing's hand, which for many decades had been called erroneously Chaetangium ornatum (Linnaeus) Kützing, Papenfuss (l.c.) adopted a synonym, Fucus erinaceus Turner (Nothogenia erinacea (Turner) Parkinson), but retained the generic name Chaetangium. After the Sydney Code made it clear that Chaetangium must be typified with F. ornatus, Parkinson (1983: 606) pointed out that this generic name had priority over Suhria by a few days. To prevent confusion arising from the use of the name Chaetangium in the Gelidiaceae, he proposed Suhria for conservation against Chaetangium, and this proposal was approved by the Committee for Algae (Christensen, 1987a: 67). Parkinson (op.cit.) resurrected Nothogenia Montagne (1843a: 302) as a replacement for Chaetangium"  
 

 

   

 
 Subordinate Taxa  Rank  Verified Standards Met  Verified Min Standards Met  Unverified Percent Standards Met
 
LOADING...
 

A gray graphic bar
Search on:  Any Name or TSN  Common Name  Scientific Name  TSN
     


Disclaimer: ITIS taxonomy is based on the latest scientific consensus available, and is provided as a general reference source for interested parties. However, it is not a legal authority for statutory or regulatory purposes. While every effort has been made to provide the most reliable and up-to-date information available, ultimate legal requirements with respect to species are contained in provisions of treaties to which the United States is a party, wildlife statutes, regulations, and any applicable notices that have been published in the Federal Register. For further information on U.S. legal requirements with respect to protected taxa, please contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

A gray bar